Skip to main content

Antenna Theory Crash Course Part 4: Understanding How Antennas Radiate - Patterns and Directivity

Antennas serve as crucial transitional structures between guided electromagnetic energy (like in transmission lines) and the free space through which radio waves propagate [1, 2]. Understanding how they radiate energy is fundamental to antenna theory, and two key concepts in this understanding are **radiation patterns** and **directivity**.

Radiation Patterns

An **antenna radiation pattern**, also known as an **antenna pattern**, is defined as a **mathematical function or a graphical representation of the radiation properties of the antenna as a function of space coordinates** [3]. These properties are typically determined in the **far-field region** and are represented based on **directional coordinates** [3]. The radiation properties of concern include **power flux density, radiation intensity, field strength, directivity, phase, or polarisation** [3].

  • The radiation pattern primarily describes the **two- or three-dimensional spatial distribution of radiated energy** as observed at a **constant radius** from the antenna [3]. A convenient coordinate system for antenna analysis is the spherical coordinate system [3, 4].
  • A **trace of the received electric (magnetic) field at a constant radius** is termed the **amplitude field pattern** [3]. Conversely, a **graph of the spatial variation of the power density along a constant radius** is known as an **amplitude power pattern** [3]. Power patterns often represent a plot of the **square of the magnitude of the electric or magnetic field as a function of angular space** [4].
  • Radiation patterns can be visualised as **two-dimensional cuts** or as **three-dimensional patterns** [5-8]. **Three-dimensional programs**, such as one designated as **Spherical** (a MATLAB-based program), can be used to produce these visualisations [7].
  • A typical radiation pattern exhibits a **major lobe** (or main beam), which represents the direction of maximum radiation, and other lobes with lower radiation intensity, known as **minor lobes** and potentially a **back lobe** [9].
  • **Beamwidth** is a significant parameter associated with the radiation pattern. It is defined as the **angular separation between two identical points on opposite sides of the pattern maximum** [6]. The **Half-Power Beamwidth (HPBW)**, a widely used measure, is the angle between the two directions where the radiation intensity is **one-half the maximum value** [6]. Another important beamwidth is the **First-Null Beamwidth (FNBW)**, which is the **angular separation between the first nulls of the pattern** [6].

Directivity

**Directivity** is a key **figure of merit** that describes **how well a radiator directs energy in a certain direction** [10]. The IEEE Standard Definitions of Terms for Antennas (IEEE Std 145–1983) define the **directivity of an antenna** as the **ratio of the radiation intensity in a given direction from the antenna to the radiation intensity averaged over all directions** [11]. If the direction is not specified, the direction of **maximum radiation intensity is implied** [11].

  • In simpler terms, the directivity of a nonisotropic source is the **ratio of its radiation intensity in a given direction over that of an isotropic source** [11]. Mathematically, directivity ($D$) can be expressed as $D = \frac{U}{U_0} = \frac{4\pi U}{P_{rad}}$, where $U$ is the radiation intensity in a given direction, $U_0$ is the radiation intensity of an isotropic source (equal to $\frac{P_{rad}}{4\pi}$), and $P_{rad}$ is the total power radiated [11]. The **maximum directivity** ($D_0$) occurs in the direction of maximum radiation intensity ($U_{max}$) and is given by $D_0 = \frac{4\pi U_{max}}{P_{rad}}$ [11].
  • For an antenna where the radiation intensity $U$ is a function of the spherical angles $\theta$ and $\phi$, the directivity $D(\theta, \phi)$ as a function of these angles can be expressed [10, 12]. For example, if $U = A_0 \sin \theta$, the maximum directivity $D_0 = 1.27$, and the directivity as a function of direction is $D = 1.27 \sin \theta$ [12]. Similarly, if $U = A_0 \sin^2 \theta$, $D_0 = 1.5$, and $D = 1.5 \sin^2 \theta$ [10].
  • For antennas with one narrow major lobe and negligible minor lobes, the **beam solid angle** ($\Omega_A$) is approximately equal to the product of the half-power beamwidths in two perpendicular planes: $\Omega_A \approx \Theta_{1r} \Theta_{2r}$, where the beamwidths are in radians [13]. In this case, the **approximate maximum directivity** can be calculated as $D_0 \approx \frac{4\pi}{\Omega_A}$ [14]. If the beamwidths are given in degrees ($\Theta_{1d}$ and $\Theta_{2d}$), an approximate directivity formula by Kraus is $D_0 \approx \frac{32400}{\Theta_{1d} \Theta_{2d}}$ [14, 15]. Other approximate formulas, such as those by Tai and Pereira, also exist [16-18].
  • The directivity is a crucial parameter for various antenna types:
    • For a **small dipole**, the directivity $D_0 = 1.5$ or $1.761$ dB [19].
    • A **quarter-wavelength monopole** has a directivity of $3.286$ or $5.167$ dB [20].
    • The directivity of a dipole increases as its length increases, up to a point [21, 22].
    • Arrays of antennas are designed to achieve higher directivities than single elements [23, 24]. For example, the directivity of end-fire arrays can be improved using techniques like the Hansen-Woodyard condition [25, 26].
    • The directivity of aperture antennas depends on the field distribution over the aperture area [27, 28]. For a rectangular aperture with a constant field distribution, the directivity can be calculated using specific formulas [28, 29].
    • Horn antennas exhibit directivity that is related to their flare angle and length [30].
    • Microstrip patch antennas also have a defined directivity that can be estimated using approximate formulas or more complex models [31-33].
    • Reflector antennas, like paraboloidal reflectors, can achieve high directivities depending on their size and the feed antenna used [34, 35].
  • **Computer programs** such as **Directivity**, **Arrays**, **Dipole**, **Yagi Uda**, **Log-Periodic Dipole Array**, and **Aperture**, available for Balanis' textbook, are valuable tools for computing and analysing the directivity of different antenna configurations [29, 36-38].

In summary, radiation patterns provide a spatial map of an antenna's radiated energy, while directivity quantifies its ability to focus that energy in a particular direction. These concepts are fundamental in characterising and designing antennas for various applications [39].

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Telecoms: ePSK - Multiple Pre-Shared Keys

Originally posted on the Cambium Community Networks Just in case you missed it cnMaestro Version 2.2.1 (Cloud and On-Premise), brings us a great new feature called ePSK. If you’re not familiar with ePSK it’s maybe because Cambium are too modest to toot their own trumpet so I’m going to do it for them. In short ePSK gives each user a unique PSK (pre-shared key) when using WPA2-Personal, for me to explain why this is such a useful feature let me first explain the problem with using a shared PSK across the whole WLAN. When a wireless client connects to an AP it completes a 4-Way handshake, this generates the encryption keys used to encrypt wireless traffic. For the 4-way handshake to work it is a requirement that both the client and AP know the passphrase, however the passphrase is never transmitted over the air thereby making this exchange reasonably secure. But what happens when a 3rd party already knows the passphrase? It means they just need to capture the 4-way handshake to gener...

Trump’s Policies and Their Impact on Papua New Guinea and the Pacific Islands

With Donald Trump taking office as the 47th president of the United States, his administration quickly embarked on sweeping and polarizing policy changes. Through a series of executive orders, Trump underscored his administration's focus on reshaping U.S. policies in areas such as immigration, trade, climate, and foreign aid. While these efforts are primarily centered on advancing U.S. domestic interests, their repercussions are set to ripple across the globe, especially in regions like the Pacific Islands, where economic and environmental challenges are deeply tied to global policies. For Papua New Guinea (PNG) and its Pacific neighbors, Trump’s policies pose both challenges and potential opportunities. These small island nations depend heavily on international trade, foreign aid, and climate action, all of which are areas of uncertainty under the new administration. Key decisions, such as the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Climate...

Defending Freedom of Speech: The Implications of Facebook Censorship in Papua New Guinea

The Papua New Guinea (PNG) government's recent move to regulate Facebook has sparked significant debate. Citing concerns over misinformation and social unrest, authorities have tested ICT controls to monitor and potentially restrict access to the platform. While the intention is to promote responsible social media use, this action raises critical questions about freedom of expression in the country. The Government's Justification for Facebook Regulation Authorities argue that Facebook has become a conduit for malicious content, including fake news and defamatory material, which could endanger public safety. By implementing a temporary ban or stricter controls, they aim to assess the platform's impact and develop strategies to mitigate these risks. This approach, they claim, is necessary to maintain social harmony and protect citizens from harmful content. However, this rationale has been met with skepticism. Critics contend that such measures...